At Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:35:01 -0800, Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakre...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:08 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > One thing I started to wonder about since is whether we should remove the > > io_ > > prefix from io_object, io_context. The prefixes make sense on the C level, > > but > > it's not clear to me that that's also the case on the table level. > > Yeah, +1. It's hard to argue that there would be any confusion, > considering `io_` is in the name of the view.
We usually add such prefixes to the columns of system views and catalogs, but it seems that's not the case for the stats views. Thus +1 from me, too. > (Unless, I suppose, some other, non-I/O, "some_object" or > "some_context" column were to be introduced to this view in the > future. But that doesn't seem likely?) I don't think that can happen. As for corss-views ambiguity, that is already present. Many columns in stats views share the same names with some other views. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
