On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:43 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2023-02-17 08:30:09 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > Thanks, I was not completely sure about whether we need to bump > > XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC for this patch as this makes the additional space just > > by changing the datatype of one of the members of the existing WAL > > record. We normally change it for the addition/removal of new fields > > aka change in WAL record format, or addition of a new type of WAL > > record. Does anyone else have an opinion/suggestion on this matter? > > I'd definitely change it - the width of a field still means you can't really > parse the old WAL sensibly anymore. >
Okay, thanks for your input. I'll push this patch early next week. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
