On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 13:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 8:23 PM Masahiko Sawada
> <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:55 PM Ajin Cherian <itsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > (v67)
> >
> > I have some questions about adding the infrastructure for DDL deparsing.
> >
> > Apart from the changes made by 0001 patch to add infrastructure for
> > DDL deparsing, 0002 patch seems to add some variables that are not
> > used in 0002 patch:
> >
> > @@ -2055,6 +2055,7 @@ typedef struct AlterTableStmt
> > List *cmds; /* list of subcommands */
> > ObjectType objtype; /* type of object */
> > bool missing_ok; /* skip error if table
> > missing */
> > + bool table_like; /* internally generated for
> > TableLikeClause */
> > } AlterTableStmt;
> >
> > @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ typedef struct CollectedATSubcmd {
> > ObjectAddress address; /* affected column,
> > constraint, index, ... */
> > Node *parsetree;
> > + char *usingexpr;
> > } CollectedATSubcmd;
> >
> > typedef struct CollectedCommand
> > @@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ typedef struct CollectedCommand
> > {
> > Oid objectId;
> > Oid classId;
> > + bool rewrite;
> > List *subcmds;
> > } alterTable;
> >
> > These three variables are used in 0006 patch.
> >
>
> Hmm, then it should be better to move these to 0006 patch.
Makes sense. Because the variables "table_like" and "usingexpr" are used in
0002 patch,
so I only moved "rewrite" to 0006 patch.
Best Regards,
Hou zj
