On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:47:55AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > Here is a new version of the stopgap/back-branch fix for restore_command. > This is more or less a rebased version of v4 with an added stderr message > as Andres suggested upthread.
So, this thread has moved around many subjects, still we did not get to the core of the issue which is what we should try to do to avoid sporadic failures like what the top of the thread is mentioning. Perhaps beginning a new thread with a patch and a summary would be better at this stage? Another thing I am wondering is if it could be possible to test that rather reliably. I have been playing with a few scenarios like holding the system() call for a bit with hardcoded sleep()s, without much success. I'll try harder on that part.. It's been mentioned as well that we could just move away from system() in the long-term. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
