Thanks for looking into this!

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:15 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  FWIW the patch still accepts an incorrect parameter '1abc'
> by ignoring any trailing garbage.
Indeed, fixed.
>
> In any case, I reckon the error message should be more specific. In
> other words, it would be better if it suggests the expected input
> format and range.
+1.
Not a range, actually, because upper limits have no sense for a user.

>
> Regarding the second patch, if we want \watch to throw an error
> message for the garbage trailing to sleep times, I think we should do
> the same for iteration counts.
+1, done.

> Additionally, we need to update the
> documentation.
Done.

Thanks for the review!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment: v3-0002-Add-iteration-count-argument-to-psql-watch-comman.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v3-0001-Fix-incorrect-argument-handling-in-psql-watch.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to