Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-03-03 15:09:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It'd be good to have a header comment for ExecInitExprRec documenting
>> the arguments, particularly that resv/resnull are where to put the
>> subplan's eventual result.
> Did you mean ExecInitSubPlanExpr()?
Right, copy-and-pasteo, sorry.
>> You could avoid having to assume ExprState's resvalue/resnull being
>> safe to use by instead using the target resv/resnull. This would
>> require putting those into the EEOP_PARAM_SET step so that
>> ExecEvalParamSet knows where to fetch from, so maybe it's not an
>> improvement, but perhaps worth considering.
> I think that'd be a bit worse - we'd have more pointers that can't be handled
> in a generic way in JIT.
OK.
regards, tom lane
