At Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:21:14 -0500, Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 2:34 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > That, but also because it's simply more reliable. autovacuum=off doesn't > > protect against a anti-wraparound vacuum or such. Or a concurrent test > > somehow > > triggering a read. Or ... > > Good point. Attached is what you suggested. I committed the transaction > before the drop table so that the statistics would be visible when we > queried pg_stat_io.
While I don't believe anti-wraparound vacuum can occur during testing, Melanie's solution (moving the commit by a few lines) seems working (by a manual testing). regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
