On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:56:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:42:20PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > ah right I should have checked. but the same ABI compatibility concern > > still exists for version 1.0 of the extension. > > Yes, we'd better make sure that the past code is able to run, at > least. Now I am not really convinced that we have the need to enforce > an error with the new code even if 1.0 is still installed,
So keep this "deprecated" C function working, as it would only be a few lines of code? > so as it is > possible to remove all the traces of the code that triggers errors if > an end LSN is higher than the current insert LSN for primaries or > replayed LSN for standbys. +1 for that
