Greetings,

* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > Push, thanks again!
> 
> Why'd you only change HEAD?  Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> back branches?

We hadn't had any complaints about it and so I wasn't sure if it was
useful to back-patch it.  I'm happy to do so though.

Thanks,

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to