On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 5:16 PM Önder Kalacı <onderkal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> wip_for_optimize_index_column_match
>> +static bool
>> +IndexContainsAnyRemoteColumn(IndexInfo *indexInfo,
>> + LogicalRepRelation *remoterel)
>> +{
>> + for (int i = 0; i < indexInfo->ii_NumIndexAttrs; i++)
>> + {
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to just check if the first column is not part of
>> the remote column then we can skip that index?
>
>
> Reading [1], I think I can follow what you suggest. So, basically,
> if the leftmost column is not filtered, we have the following:
>
>> but the entire index would have to be scanned, so in most cases the planner
>> would prefer a sequential table scan over using the index.
>
>
> So, in our case, we could follow a similar approach. If the leftmost column
> of the index
> is not sent over the wire from the pub, we can prefer the sequential scan.
>
> Is my understanding of your suggestion accurate?
>
Yes. I request an opinion from Shi-San who has reported the problem.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
