Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > On 15 May 2018 at 22:55, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Here's a proposed patch for that.
> In the case 1 ^ NaN = 1, what should the result scale be? The result is exact, so I don't see a reason to be worried about its scale. Messing with the scale would also require expending even more code on what is, in the end, a corner case that no users have expressed concern about. regards, tom lane