so 18. 3. 2023 v 16:24 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> napsal:
> > On 2023-02-16 Th 23:04, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > čt 16. 2. 2023 v 12:49 odesílatel Jelte Fennema <m...@jeltef.nl> napsal: > >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 12:44, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > To find and use pg_backend_pid is not rocket science. But use >> :BACKEND_PID is simpler. >> >> I wanted to call out that if there's a connection pooler (e.g. >> PgBouncer) in the middle, then BACKEND_PID (and %p) are incorrect, but >> pg_backend_pid() would work for the query. This might be an edge case, >> but if BACKEND_PID is added it might be worth listing this edge case >> in the docs somewhere. >> > > good note > > > > This patch is marked RFC, but given the comments upthread from Tom, Andres > and Peter, I think it should actually be Rejected. > ok regards Pavel > > cheers > > > andrew > > -- > Andrew Dunstan > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com > >
