At Sat, 18 Mar 2023 10:26:42 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote in > Hi, > > I'm attaching a patch to do $subject in autoprewarm.c and worker_spi > extensions. The way it is right now doesn't hurt anyone, but why to > fail after defining custom GUCs if we aren't loading them via > shared_preload_libraries. > > Thoughts?
I don't think they're misplaced at least for pg_prewram. pg_prewarm worker allows to be executed after startup and the variable is still used by such prewarm worker processes, but the patch make the variable stop working in that case. I didn't look at the part for worker_spi.c. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
