On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:41:39PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > * Avoid hiding shared filesets in pg_ls_tmpdir (pg_ls_* functions for > showing metadata ...) > - According to the internet "As part of their 39 month old > development and milestones, your patch should be able to see like an > adult (20/20 vision), be able to run, walk, hop and balance himself > while standing with one foot quite confidently." Can it do all those > things yet?
It's not a large patch, and if you read the summaries that I've written, you'll see that I've presented it as several patches specifically to allow the essential, early patches to progress; the later patches are optional - I stopped sending them since people were evidently distracted by the optional patches at the exclusion of the essential patches. > - Should this be broken up into smaller CF entries so at least some > of them can be Ready for Committer and closed? Opening and closing CF entries sounds like something which would maximize the administrative overhead of the process rather than progressing the patch. > > * CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned table > - I'm guessing this patch is too big and too late to go in this CF. > And it sounds like there's still work to be done? Should this be > marked RwF? If you look, you'll see that's it's straightforward and *also* small. As I wrote last week, it's very viable for v16. On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > * CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned table > > My patch. I think there's agreement that this patch is ready, except > that it's waiting on the bugfix for the progress reporting patch. IDK > if there's interest in this, but it'd be a good candidate for v16. -- Justin
