On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:30:06AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> I have spent a couple of hours looking at the whole again today, >> testing that with OpenSSL to make sure that everything was OK. Apart >> from a few tweaks, that seemed pretty good. So, applied. > > Thank you!
Please note that the CF entry has been marked as committed. We should really do something about having a cleaner separation between SASL, the mechanisms and the AUTH_REQ_* codes, in the long term, though honestly I don't know yet what would be the most elegant and the least error-prone approach. And for anything that touches authentication, simpler means better. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
