On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 02:52, Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > There was one small typo keeping this from compiling. Also a repeated > word. I've fixed these. I also edited a bit of indentation and tweaked > some wording. Diff attached (to be applied on top of your diff).
Thanks for fixing that mistake. For reference, I had changed things to end lines early so that the glossterm tags could be on a line of their own without breaking to a new line. The rest of the file seems to be done that way, so I thought we'd better stick to it. I swapped out "associated WAL" for "unflushed WAL". I didn't agree that the WAL that would be flushed would have any particular association with the to-be-written page. I dropped CTAS since I didn't see any other mention in the docs about that. I could maybe see the sense in making reference to the abbreviated form if we were going to mention it again and didn't want to spell the whole thing out each time, but that's not the case here. I pushed the result. David
