On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> The second would mean that SELECT * from foreign table reports
> remotetableoid as well, which is awkward.
No it wouldn't. You'd just make the additional column resjunk, same
as we do for wholerow.
> Anyway, my comment to which you have replied is obsolete now. I found
> a solution to that problem, which I have implemented in 0003 in the
> latest patch-set I have shared.
Yeah, but I'm not sure I like that solution very much. I don't think
abusing the tableoid to store a remote table OID is very nice.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company