On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 6:58 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Pavel Luzanov <p.luza...@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > What if this long output will be available only for \du+, and for \du > > just show distinct (without duplicates) > > roles in the current array format? For those, who don't care about these > > new membership options, nothing will change. > > Those, who need details will use the + modifier. > > ? > > I kind of like that. Would we change to newlines in the Attributes > field in both \du and \du+? (I'm +1 for that, but maybe others aren't.) > > If we don't change the \du "Member of" column display (aside from removing duplicates) I'm disinclined to change the Attributes column. I too am partial to only exposing this detail on the extended (+) display. David J.
