On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:44:58AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 7:29 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> > Replacing that with a six-element integer array would be a clear >> > improvement >> > and, IMHO, better than adding yet another function to the extension. >> >> I'd have no issue with that. > > Cool.
The six-element array approach won't show the number of dirty and pinned buffers for each usage count, but I'm not sure that's a deal-breaker. Barring objections, I'll post an updated patch shortly with that approach. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
