Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 6:55 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Given the frequency of failures on this in the buildfarm, I propose using the
>> temporary workaround of using wal_level=replica. That avoids the use of the
>> over-eager log_newpage_range().
> Will do.
Now crake is doing this:
2023-04-08 16:50:03.177 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:03 EDT 3257645:3]
004_io_direct.pl LOG: statement: select count(*) from t1
2023-04-08 16:50:03.316 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:03 EDT 3257646:1] ERROR: invalid
page in block 56 of relation base/5/16384
2023-04-08 16:50:03.316 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:03 EDT 3257646:2] STATEMENT:
select count(*) from t1
2023-04-08 16:50:03.317 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:03 EDT 3257645:4]
004_io_direct.pl ERROR: invalid page in block 56 of relation base/5/16384
2023-04-08 16:50:03.317 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:03 EDT 3257645:5]
004_io_direct.pl STATEMENT: select count(*) from t1
2023-04-08 16:50:03.319 EDT [2023-04-08 16:50:02 EDT 3257591:4] LOG:
background worker "parallel worker" (PID 3257646) exited with exit code 1
The fact that the error is happening in a parallel worker seems
interesting ...
(BTW, why are the log lines doubly timestamped?)
regards, tom lane
