Hi, On 2023-04-10 08:14:18 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 12:01:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > Why would it mean that? Parallel workers are updated together with the > > leader, > > so there's no compatibility issue? > > My point is that the callback system would still need to be maintained > in a stable branch, and, while useful, it could be used for much more > than it is originally written. I guess that this could be used in > custom nodes with their own custom parallel nodes.
Hm, I'm somewhat doubtful that that's something we should encourage. And doubtful we'd get it right without a concrete use case at hand to verify the design. Greetings, Andres Freund
