Hi,
On 2023-04-11 14:46:23 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Yes, $SUBJECT is correct.
>
> On an old centos6 VM which I'd forgotten about and never removed from
> monitoring, I noticed that a process had recently crashed...
>
> Maybe this is an issue which was already fixed, but I looked and find no
> bug report nor patch about it. Feel free to dismiss the problem report
> if it's not interesting or useful.
> postgres was compiled locally at 4e54d231a. It'd been running
> continuously since September without crashing until a couple weeks ago
> (and running nearly-continuously for months before that).
It possibly could be:
Author: Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>
Branch: master [cb2e7ddfe] 2022-12-02 18:10:30 -0800
Branch: REL_15_STABLE Release: REL_15_2 [c6a60471a] 2022-12-02 18:07:47 -0800
Branch: REL_14_STABLE Release: REL_14_7 [6344bc097] 2022-12-02 18:10:30 -0800
Branch: REL_13_STABLE Release: REL_13_10 [7944d2d8c] 2022-12-02 18:13:40 -0800
Branch: REL_12_STABLE Release: REL_12_14 [35b99a18f] 2022-12-02 18:16:14 -0800
Branch: REL_11_STABLE Release: REL_11_19 [af3517c15] 2022-12-02 18:17:54 -0800
Prevent pgstats from getting confused when relkind of a relation changes
But the fact that it's on a catalog table's stats makes it less likely,
although not impossible.
Any chance there were conversions from tables to views in that connection?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
