On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 12:31, Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 12:24, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:51 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > One thing I think we should do in this area is introduce #defines for
>> > > all the message type codes and use those instead of having hard-coded
>> > > constants everywhere.
>> >
>> > +1, but I wonder where we should put those exactly.  My first thought
>> > was postgres_ext.h, but the charter for that is
>> >
>> >  *     This file contains declarations of things that are visible
>> everywhere
>> >  *  in PostgreSQL *and* are visible to clients of frontend interface
>> libraries.
>> >  *  For example, the Oid type is part of the API of libpq and other
>> libraries.
>> >
>> > so picayune details of the wire protocol probably don't belong there.
>> > Maybe we need a new header concerned with the wire protocol?
>>
>> Yeah. I sort of thought maybe one of the files in src/include/libpq
>> would be the right place, but it doesn't look like it.
>>
>> If we at least created the defines and replaced occurrences with the
> same, then we can litigate where to put them later.
>
> I think I'd prefer this in a different patch, but I'd be willing to take a
> run at it.
>

As promised here is a patch with defines for all of the protocol messages.
I created a protocol.h file and put it in src/includes
I'm fairly sure that some of the names I used may need to be changed but
the grunt work of finding and replacing everything is done.

Dave Cramer

>
> Dave
>

Attachment: 0001-Created-protocol.h.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to