Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2023-Apr-24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I guess we could have the back branches continue to create a
>> shared_cast_context and just not use it in core. Seems rather
>> expensive for a very hypothetical compatibility measure, though.
> I think a session-long memory leak is not so bad, compared to a possible
> crash. However, after looking at the code again, as well as pldebugger
> and plpgsql_check, I agree that there's no point in doing anything other
> than keeping the field there.
Yeah, I can't see any plausible reason for outside code to be using
that field (and I don't see any evidence in Debian Code Search that
anyone is). I'll push it like this then. Thanks for looking!
regards, tom lane
