> On 28 Apr 2023, at 06:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> If they're that slow, I'd worry more about generating 20GB of xact status >> data. That's why the tests are disabled by default. > > There is exactly zero chance that anyone will accept the introduction > of such an expensive test into either check-world or the buildfarm > sequence. Even though the entire suite is disabled by default, shouldn't it also require PG_TEST_EXTRA to be consistent with other off-by-default suites like for example src/test/kerberos? -- Daniel Gustafsson
