On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 04:51, Michael Paquier <[mich...@paquier.xyz](mailto:On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 04:51, Michael Paquier <<a href=)> wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 02:13:28PM +0000, gkokola...@pm.me wrote: >> Good point. I thought about it before submitting the patch. I >> concluded that given the complexity and operations involved in >> LZ4Stream_read_internal() and the rest of t he pg_dump/pg_restore >> code, the memset() call will be negligible. However from the >> readability point of view, the function is a bit cleaner with the >> memset(). >> >> I will not object to any suggestion though, as this is a very >> trivial point. Please find attached a v2 of the patch following the >> suggested approach. > > Please note that an open item has been added for this stuff. Thank you but I am not certain I know what that means. Can you please explain? Cheers, //Georgios > -- > Michael
