"=?utf-8?B?55uP5LiA?=" <w...@hidva.com> writes: > The proposed implementation can significantly improve the interoperability > between C and C++ code in PostgreSQL. It allows for seamless integration of > C++ code with PostgreSQL, without the need for complex workarounds or > modifications to the existing codebase.
That'd be nice to have, certainly ... > I have submitted the implementation > on [GitHub](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/1a9a2790430f256d9d0cc371249e43769d93eb8e#diff-6b6034caa00ddf38f641cbd10d5a5d1bb7135f8b23c5a879e9703bd11bd8240f). > I would appreciate it if you could review the implementation and provide > feedback. ... but I think this patch has no hope of being adequately portable. It seems extremely specific to one particular C++ implementation (unless you can show that every single thing you've used here is in the C++ standard), and then for good measure you've thrown in a new dependency on pthreads. On top of that, doesn't this require us to move our minimum language requirement to C++-something? We just barely got done deciding C99 was okay to use. regards, tom lane
