On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:46 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > What I'm inclined to do about it is just revert this particular > > change. But I'd better run around and see where else I did that, > > because the idea is evidently not ready for prime time. > > Looks like that was the only such change in 2489d76c4 or > follow-ons, so done, with a test case based on your example.
Thanks, Tom! -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
