On 3/31/23 11:00 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
I mention this now because I'm not sure whether to consider this an 'open item' for 16, or merely an enhancement for 17. I guess the former, because someone might call that a new denial of service vector. On the other hand, if you fill up the listen queue for socket 1 with enough vigour, you're also denying service to socket 1, so I don't know if it's worth worrying about. Opinions on that?I'm not sure either. It doesn't strike me as a particularly relevant bottleneck. And the old approach of doing more work for every single connection also made many connections worse, I think?Alright, let's see if anyone else thinks this is worth fixing for 16.
[RMT hat]Given this has sat for a bit, I wanted to see if any of your thinking has changed on whether this should be fixed for v16 or v17. I have personally not formed an opinion yet, but per the current discussion, it seems like this could wait?
Thanks, Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
