On 6/6/23 3:56 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
On 6/6/23 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name. There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU. I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".Either OK by meSame here
Since we're bikeshedding, "postgresql" or "builtin" could make it seem to a (app) developer that these may be recommended options, as we're trusting PostgreSQL to make the best choices for us. Granted, v16 is (theoretically) defaulting to ICU, so that choice is made, but the unsuspecting developer could make a switch based on that naming.
However, I don't have a strong alternative -- I understand the concern about "internal", so I'd be OK with "postgresql" unless a better name appears.
Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
