On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:32:15AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > + <para> > + Remove backup history files. > > Isn't it better to document clearly which backup history files to be removed? > For example, "In addition to removing WAL files, remove backup history files > with prefixes logically preceding the oldestkeptwalfile.".
I've written about this part at the beginning of this one, where this sounds like a duplicated description of the Description section: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/zg1nq13v411y4...@paquier.xyz > printf(_(" -n, --dry-run dry run, show the names of the > files that would be removed\n")); > + printf(_(" -b, --clean-backup-history clean up files including backup > history files\n")); > > Shouldn't -b option be placed in alphabetical order? +1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
