Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Maybe I am being too naive, but wouldn't it be just enough to update the > confirmed flush LSN to ctx->reader->ReadRecPtr? This way, the slot > advances up to the beginning of the last record where user wants to > advance, and not the beginning of the next record:
Same problem should be handled at pg_logical_slot_get_changes_guts and apply worker feedback; and there is a convention that all commits since confirmed_flush must be decoded, so we risk decoding such boundary commit twice. -- Arseny Sher Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
