On 6/14/23 09:01, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:46:05 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizh...@garret.ru>
wrote in
But I do not think that it is somehow related with using threads
instead of process.
The question whether to use private or shared cache is not directly
related to threads vs. process choice.
Yeah, I unconsciously conflated the two things. We can use per-thread
cache on multithreading.
For sure, and we can drop the cache when dropping the memory context.
And in the first versions of an imagined threaded PostgreSQL I am sure
that is how things will work.
Then later someone will have to investigate which caches are worth
making shared and what the eviction/expiration strategy should be.
Andreas
