Em qua., 14 de jun. de 2023 às 06:51, Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:39 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Gurjeet has mentioned that eb.rel cannot be modified by another >> process since the value or memory is in the local stack, and I believe >> he's correct. >> >> If the pointed Relation had been blown out, eb.rel would be left >> dangling, not nullified. However, I don't believe this situation >> happens (or it shouldn't happen) as the entire relation should already >> be locked. > > > Yeah, Gurjeet is right. I had a thinko here. eb.rel should not be NULL > pointer in any case. And as we've acquired the lock for it, it should > not have been closed. So I think we can remove the check for eb.rel in > the two places. > Ok, As there is a consensus on removing the tests and the comment is still relevant, here is a new version for analysis. regards, Ranier Vilela
v3-0001-Remove-always-true-checks.patch
Description: Binary data
