Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks, Bertrand. I chickened out and ended up committing v1 for now > (i.e., simply removing the truncation code).
WFM.
> If anyone disagrees and wants to see the FATALs emitted from
> ProcessStartupPacket() directly, please let me know and we can work on
> adding them in a follow-up patch.
I think the new behavior is fine.
regards, tom lane
