> On 6 Jul 2023, at 02:19, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not entirely sure this is worth the effort. > > I am not sure either.. I can't see off the cuff that it would bring better test coverage or find bugs relative to the effort of making it stable. > Anyway, the buildfarm code does similar things > already, see around $bad_module in TestUpgradeXversion.pm, for > instance. So this kind of workaround exists already. It seems to me > that we should try to pull that out of the buildfarm code and have > that in the core module instead as a routine that would be used by the > in-core TAP tests of pg_upgrade and the buildfarm code. That however, would be a more interesting outcome. -- Daniel Gustafsson
