Hello David, 11.05.2023 16:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
Yeah, I see. It's also interesting to me, which tests perform better after that commit. It takes several hours to run all tests, so I can't present results quickly, but I'll try to collect this information next week.
To my regret, I could not find such tests that week, so I decided to try later, after reviewing my benchmark running infrastructure. But for now, as Postgres Pro company graciously shared the benchmarking infrastructure project [1], it's possible for anyone to confirm or deny my results. (You can also see which tests were performed and how.) Having done one more round of comprehensive testing, I still couldn't find winning tests for commit 3c6fc5820 (but reassured that test s64da_tpcds.query87 loses a little (and also s64da_tpcds.query38)). So it seems to me that the tests I performed or their parameters is not representative enough for that improvement, unfortunately. [1] https://github.com/postgrespro/pg-mark Best regards, Alexander
