On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:12 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:38:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > While working recently on what has led to cfc43ae and fc55c7f, I > > really got the feeling that there could be some command sequences that > > lacked some CCIs (or CommandCounterIncrement calls) to make sure that > > the catalog updates are visible in any follow-up steps in the same > > transaction. > > Wait a minute. The validation of a partitioned index uses a copy of > the pg_index tuple from the relcache, which be out of date: > newtup = heap_copytuple(partedIdx->rd_indextuple); > ((Form_pg_index) GETSTRUCT(newtup))->indisvalid = true;
But why the recache entry is outdated, does that mean that in the previous command, we missed registering the invalidation for the recache entry? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
