Pushed. I made a couple of minor changes, in particular I added the word "one" to this sentence, which was already under discussion:
On 2018-May-24, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:30:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > + possible to show the difference between a plan whose partitions have > > been > > + pruned and one whose partitions haven't. A typical unoptimized plan > > for > > + this type of table setup is: > > > > "a plan whose partitions have been pruned" sounds a bit off; maybe, "a > > plan in which partitions have been pruned". > > I wrote: > > "[...] a plan for which partitions have been pruned and for which they have > not." "it's possible to show the difference between a plan for which partitions have been pruned and *one* for which they have not." Thanks! -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
