At Mon, 7 Aug 2023 17:11:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote in > That way I think it's flexible enough to add more code if needed in > the SRF. > > The patch also: > > - updates the doc > - works with autoconf and meson > - adds a simple test > > I'm adding a new CF entry for it.
As I mentioned in another thread, I'm uncertain about our stance on the class id of the wait event. If a class acts as a namespace, we should include it in the view. Otherwise, if the class id is just an attribute of the wait event, we should make the event name unique. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
