On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:32 PM Thomas Munro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does anyone else want to object?  Restating the case in brief: commit
> 31966b15's naming is short-sighted and likely to lead to a
> proliferation of similar things or a renaming in later releases.

+1 to proceeding with this change.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


Reply via email to