On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:12 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:24 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 01:11:50PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > > Yeah right, actually I was confused, I assumed it will return the > > > start LSN of the record. And I do not see any easy way to identify > > > the Start LSN of this record so maybe this solution will not work. I > > > will have to think of something else. Thanks for pointing it out. > > > > About that. One thing to consider may be ReserveXLogInsertLocation() > > while holding the WAL insert lock, but you can just rely on > > ProcLastRecPtr for the job after inserting the REDO record, no? > > Yeah right, we can use ProcLastRecPtr. I will send the updated patch.
Here is the updated version of the patch. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v3-0001-New-WAL-record-for-checkpoint-redo-location.patch
Description: Binary data
