Hi, On 2018-06-05 10:40:22 -0700, se...@rielau.com wrote: > Big +1 on this one.
Cool. > Here is what we did. It's very crude, but minimized the amount of pain: I think I'd rather go for my approach in core though. Needlessly carrying around a bunch of pointers, and adding the necessary indirections on accesses, and more allocations don't seem to buy us that much. Nor do I really like the hackyness... Greetings, Andres Freund
