On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 15 Sep 2023, at 12:49, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> >> On 2023-Sep-15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> >>> -basic_archive_configured(ArchiveModuleState *state) >>> +basic_archive_configured(ArchiveModuleState *state, const char **errmsg) >>> >>> The variable name errmsg implies that it will contain the errmsg() data >>> when it >>> in fact is used for errhint() data, so it should be named accordingly.
I have no objection to allowing this callback to provide additional information, but IMHO this should use errdetail() instead of errhint(). In the provided patch, the new message explains how the module is not configured. It doesn't hint at how to fix it (although presumably one could figure that out pretty easily). >>> It's probably better to define the interface as ArchiveCheckConfiguredCB >>> functions returning an allocated string in the passed pointer which the >>> caller >>> is responsible for freeing. That does seem more flexible. >> Also note that this callback is documented in archive-modules.sgml, so >> that needs to be updated as well. This also means you can't backpatch >> this change, or you risk breaking external software that implements this >> interface. > > Absolutely, this is master only for v17. +1 -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
