On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 09:58:34AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: >> I think we need to explore a bit, if we want to remove that, for example >> some of the frontend modules (like pg_receivewal, pg_recvlogical) call two >> argument open which would require change. > > Yeah, sure. I am not saying that this is straight-forward, but it may > be worth the switch in the long term. What I am sure about is that the > proposed patch is simple, but that does not look like a correct > approach to me as other tools may benefit from it.
Like this other unresolved problem: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16922.1520722108%40sss.pgh.pa.us -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
