On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 4:22 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > Attached draft patch shows how this could work. > > _bt_restore_array_keys() has comments that seem to suppose that > calling _bt_preprocess_keys is fairly expensive, and something that's > well worth avoiding. But...is it, really? I wonder if we'd be better > off just biting the bullet and always calling _bt_preprocess_keys > here.
My current plan is to commit something close to my original patch on Wednesday or Thursday. My proposed fix is minimally invasive (it still allows _bt_restore_array_keys to avoid most calls to _bt_preprocess_keys), so I don't see any reason to delay acting here. -- Peter Geoghegan
