On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:23, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > FWIW, I'd argue for dropping print_path rather than continuing to > maintain it. I never use it, finding pprint() to serve the need > better and more reliably.
Then perhaps we just need to open a thread with an appropriate subject to check if anyone finds it useful and if we don't get any response after some number of weeks, just remove it from master. David
