> On 4 Oct 2023, at 17:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> OK, so now I know what the possible values of "class" are, but
> I'm still not seeing a reason why we shouldn't just assume that
> "parameter" is the only one of interest.
I think "parameter" is the only one of interest for this usecase (params to
application options), but it might not necessarily be applicable to other uses
of <replaceable /> we have in the tree, like for example in bki.sgml:
<replaceable>oprname(lefttype,righttype)</replaceable>
But since we don't know if anyone is rendering our docs with a custom style, or
ever will, this is all very theoretical. Maybe skipping the class attribute is
the right choice for consistency?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
