On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:36:20PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-10-09 19:26:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:08:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > There's an alternative approach we could take, which is to write in 4KB > > > increments, while keeping 8KB pages. With the current format that's not > > > obviously a bad idea. But given there aren't really advantages in 8KB WAL > > > pages, it seems we should just go for 4KB? > > > > How do we handle shorter maximum row lengths and shorter maximum index > > entry lengths? > > The WAL blocksize shouldn't influence either, unless we have a bug somewhere.
Oh, good point. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.