On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:12:49AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> On 10/10/23 7:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I was looking at v8 just before you sent this v9, and still got
>> annoyed by the extra boolean argument added to InitPostgres().
> 
> Arf, I did not look at it as I had in mind to look at it once
> this one is in.

No problem.  I'm OK to do it.

>> So
>> please let me propose to bite the bullet and refactor that, as of the
>> 0001 attached that means less diff footprints in all the callers of
>> InitPostgres() (I am not wedded to the flag names).
> 
> Thanks for having looked at it!
> 
> +       bits32          init_flags = 0; /* never honor 
> session_preload_libraries */
> 
> Also a few word about datallowconn in the comment? (as the flag deals with 
> both).

I am not sure that this is necessary in the code paths of
BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid() and
BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection() as datallowconn is handled a
few lines down.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to