On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:12:49AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > On 10/10/23 7:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I was looking at v8 just before you sent this v9, and still got >> annoyed by the extra boolean argument added to InitPostgres(). > > Arf, I did not look at it as I had in mind to look at it once > this one is in.
No problem. I'm OK to do it. >> So >> please let me propose to bite the bullet and refactor that, as of the >> 0001 attached that means less diff footprints in all the callers of >> InitPostgres() (I am not wedded to the flag names). > > Thanks for having looked at it! > > + bits32 init_flags = 0; /* never honor > session_preload_libraries */ > > Also a few word about datallowconn in the comment? (as the flag deals with > both). I am not sure that this is necessary in the code paths of BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid() and BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection() as datallowconn is handled a few lines down. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature